Factors Motivating Variation

The instalment Factors motivating variation of Chapter 2 of Introducing Sociolinguistics (Meyerhoff 2006) introduces four social factors that motivated large number how to white plague speech. Meyerhoff provides a rough introduction on these factors that would be discussed deep in latter chapters. The first factor is talkers desire to show how to critical point in a group and separate from other(a)s. That means people lend oneself language to identify which group they belong to. Meyerhoff uses the Marthas vineyard shoot to explain that vineyarder used different pronunciation to distinguish themselves from summer visitor.The particularised linguistic variant is an identification to separate local group and visitor group. The second factor is speakers desire to be valuable in their group. Meyerhoff explains speaker use specific variant to raise their self image in the community, then to establish a positive image in their community. On the other hand, speakers desire to elim inate the negative by avoiding using a variant which their image would be downgraded. These iii factors motivate speakers determine how to use language to achieve a good identity in the society.Compare to the other three factors, the final one is focused on the interaction in the midst of the speaker and group members. Meyerhoff states the speakers desire to test how in-group members are orienting themselves to those three factors. Communication accommodation theory is introduced to explain this factor in generally. It presents that the speakers cipher on audience behaviors to choose the variant. Besides that the speakers will use language to test their hypotheses are workable or not. Therefore, variation is a outgrowth after these testing.