HCS 483 Information System Briefing Essay

reading System BriefingHealth Care Information SystemsHCS 483August 25, 2013Information System BriefingProviding fictional character health give carry on is rapidly becoming synonymous with health care transcriptions acquiring applied science and schooling dodgings that are the most current. Success of the health care musical ar chainment depends on the murder of instruction establishments that are designed to meet the standards of quality set by the plaque and the health care industry. Acquisition and instruction execution of newly or upgraded entropyrmation systems pose big challenges. Understanding the musical arrangements goals and the roles of the stakeholders forget sustain in the process of choosing the correct information system for manipulation by the organizations health care providers. Selection and AcquisitionCreating a control committee to start the process of selecting and acquiring is the first step for a health care organization when looking at im plementing a new information system. Appointing a project manager to lead the committee to service of process give the appropriate information and guide the committee in qualification decision. The channelise committee determines the process of implementing the new information system and conducts explore to help determine the best information system for the organizations needs. The channelise committee moldiness look at the needs of the organization for not only the current delectation but also how the system ordain grow with the organization into the future. Identifying the standards of care that the health care organization go forth help define the objectives the committee must meet and the background signal of epitome to evaluate that the organization system requirements are met. ResearchResearching the vendors for products that will meet the needs of documentation and records storage is full of life in acquiring the correct product. Contacting different vendors and se tting up product demonstrations is the best stylus to compare products. This will provide for hands-on research forease of use and real-time questions to be answered by the representative. stack away predetermined evaluation criteria from the members on the steering committee so that the survival process can begin. Collecting the individual remarks on the product must be done on the day of the presentation. Comparing the different information systems, this way will help with the selection process. Cost AnalysisThe heightened awareness in recent years of the need to live within budgets in the health care sphere of influence would seem to create the perfect climate for appeal- forcefulness analysis (Russell, Gold, Siegel, Daniels, & Weinstein, 1996, p. 1). Cost analysis is part of the findings that the steering committee must submit in their findings duration researching the different products. Cost is a driving factor in the selection of a new information system. If the new sy stem does not unify into established systems within the organization, there will be more cost associated with that product. Organizations GoalsUpholding the health care organizations goals in every thought of the acquisition phase is first priority. Forming strategies that identify with the mission and goals set away by the organization will help guide the recommendation from the steering committee. Involving other project leads from supporting departments such as Information engineering (IT) will be necessary. IT has the knowledge on the existing systems and will consecrate the insight that is needed when adding or combining system products. It is probable that IT has projects that will need to interface with the new information system. Combining ideas and research whitethorn help lead to a better information system filling for the organization. authoritys of the StakeholdersThe stakeholders roles in the organizations acquisition of new information system are from start to fi nish. There should be a stakeholders presence in the steering committee to put their skills and knowledge of the plans of the organization on the table to help influence decisions. The active stakeholder on the steering committee can report to other stakeholders on the take place and changes in the process of choosing the information system. The broad range of stakeholders is identified as anyone who holds interestin the failure or success of the organization. This can range from Chief-Executive-Officer (CEO) to business managers and administrators, doctors to the nursing staff and even patients. Patients are a vital source of information because the patient is the owner of the data entered in to the information system. Stakeholders should have active input in the entire process of research, acquisition, and implementation of a new information system. For example, The medical drug user may sine qua non an easy-to-use system releasing him or her from documentation tasks, while the administrative user wants a system enforcing complete documentation (Ammenwerth, Graber, Herrmann, Burkle, & Konig, 2003, p. 5). ConclusionWhen considering the addition or expansion of a health information system the organization must conduct research with several vendors and a steering committee to force recommendations of the product that will best fit with the requirements set forth by the organization. The goals of the organization will help guide the decisions on what information system will fit the needs currently and into the future. The stakeholders involvement in the entire project gives unique insight from the different levels of stakeholders. Patients, nurses, doctors, counsel, and executive management are all stakeholders. Combining all of these elements will help in the process of acquiring the appropriate information system for the health care organization.References Ammenwerth, E., Graber, S., Herrmann, G., Burkle, T., & Konig, J. (2003, June 7, 2002). Evaluation o f health information systemsproblems and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 71, 125-135. http//dx.doi.org/http//dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00131-X Russell, L. B., Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Daniels, N., & Weinstein, M. C. (1996, October 9, 1996). The Role of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health and Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 1172-1177. Retrieved from http//av4kc7fg4g.search.serialssolutions.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=infosid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=infoofi/fmtkevmtxjournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+role+of+cost effectiveness+analysis+in+health+and+medicine&rft.jtitle=JAMA&rft.au=Russell%2C+Louise+B&rft.au=Gold%2C+Marthe+R&rft.au=Siegel%2C+Jo